The U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal Thursday to cabin extreme partisan gerrymanders revealed a deep division between Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justice Elena Kagan over the duty of the justices to resolve an issue affecting what one justice has called “the precious right to vote.”
Federal courts have no authority to resolve disputes involving the influence partisanship plays in setting election-map boundaries, a sharply divided high court said in two cases challenging partisanship in redistricting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]