The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to overturn a key precedent that has been the target of business groups and conservatives who want to sap the power of federal regulators.

The court rejected requests to overrule Auer v. Robbins, a 1997 decision that directs courts to defer to an agency’s “reasonable interpretation” of its own ambiguous regulations. The majority also was asked to overturn a related 1945 precedent, Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]