The plaintiffs in a Maryland case that challenges the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census on Tuesday won the opportunity to present new evidence that purports to show U.S. officials acted with discriminatory motivations in moving to require survey-takers to identify their status in the country.

The ruling by a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit allows additional proceedings in the trial court, and it comes as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to announce a decision on a separate but related census case that came to the justices from New York federal district court. The justices could issue a ruling as early as Wednesday on whether the Trump administration acted lawfully in adding the citizenship question.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]