OP-ED: In a nutshell, the court concluded that “the Compassionate Use Act does not immunize what the LAD prohibits.” This decision makes sense.
June 03, 2019 at 11:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
Photo by Thom Morris.
On March 27, 2019, Judge Fisher, P.J.A.D., held that a medical marijuana patient, who is fired after failing a drug test, has a maintainable cause of action against his employer for violating the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to 49. Wild v. Carriage Funeral Holdings, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2019).
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
