National Rifle Association General Counsel Caught in Group's Firestorm
A series of late April developments at the Fairfax, Virginia-based pro-gun organization have left general counsel John Frazer and his legal team dealing with an array of challenges.
May 21, 2019 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Internal financial and legal turmoil has gripped the National Rifle Association and its leadership over the past month, and at the center of the storm sits the general counsel office, headed by 21-year organization veteran John Frazer.
A series of late April developments at the Fairfax, Virginia-based pro-gun organization have left Frazer and his legal team dealing with an array of challenges, including:
- New York Attorney General Letitia James' investigation into the NRA's tax-exempt status.
- Fallout from the dismissal of the board of director's longtime outside counsel, Steve Hart, who has declined to comment.
- Allegations of massive legal payments to other outside counsel over the past year that threaten to weaken the group.
- A bitter lawsuit between the organization and its Oklahoma-based advertising firm of 30 years, Ackerman McQueen, which operates NRATV.
- A yearlong legal battle with New York that has escalated to other states that are challenging a weapons-carry insurance program the organization sells to its members, which has been called crucial to the group's existence.
Corporate Counsel attempted to interview Frazer about the legal issues swirling around his organization, but he did not return messages Tuesday.
The problems came to head in mid-April when a power struggle arose between chief executive Wayne LaPierre and then-president Oliver North. North warned LaPierre to resign or North would release details of alleged financial improprieties and sexual harassment charges.
Instead, the board backed LaPierre and ousted North on April 29, along with its outside counsel, Hart.
North then released documents highlighting the group's legal challenges and growing legal bills.
The lawsuit against Ackerman McQueen claims the ad firm has refused to document its expenses. Ackerman issued a statement disputing the suit's claims.
Among other things the suit alleges that North was also working for the ad firm and double dipping. The suit says the ad firm allowed Frazer to see a copy of its contract with North but would not let him make a copy. The suit claims Frazer's viewing raised concerns that the organization had not been given an accurate summary of North's relationship with the ad firm.
According to his organization bio, Fraser joined the group in 1993 as an information specialist for the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, and he rose through the ranks to director of research and information in 2007.
After completing law school at night at George Mason University, he left the organization in 2013 to open his own law firm. He returned to the group in January 2015 as its general counsel and four months later was also named secretary to the board.
Frazer was reelected general counsel and secretary at the April 29 annual meeting, the same meeting that reelected LaPierre as chief executive and ousted North.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Unfair Competition'?: Akerman Files Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Maryland Nonprofit
2 minute readA&O Shearman Becomes First Long-Term Corporate Partner to UN Refugee Agency
2 minute readAfter Recasting ACC Into Global Enterprise, CEO Veta Richardson Plans 2025 Exit
Trailblazer at International Monetary Fund Handing Over Legal Reins After 27 Years With Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250