Buckley Sues Johnny Depp, Expanding Actor's Battles With Ex-Lawyers
The firm claims Depp owes $350,000 for its work representing the Hollywood star in a separate dispute over legal fees.
May 21, 2019 at 12:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The law firm Buckley sued actor Johnny Depp on Monday, claiming the star actor failed to pay $348,000 he owes the firm for its work litigating a legal malpractice suit against his previous lawyers.
Buckley said in a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court that it spent a year and a half trying to claw back some $30 million from Depp's former lawyers at Bloom Hergott Diemer Rosenthal LaViolette Feldman Schenkman & Goodman. Depp has accused Bloom Hergott of illegally taking contingency fees without a written agreement.
After racking up half-a-million dollars in fees and notching a key victory on Depp's behalf last August, Buckley said it withdrew from the case in January after Depp decided to trim the number of law firms on his payroll. That left three other firms representing him, court records indicate—Brown Rudnick, the Endeavor Law Firm and Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner.
Buckley said in Monday's suit that Depp already paid over $180,000, adding that his representative Edward White expressed gratitude for the lawyers' work and said the firm would be paid in full. But deadlines came and went, first for the first quarter of this year and then for mid-May, the firm alleged.
“Notwithstanding these expressions, to date defendants have not yet paid plaintiff's outstanding legal fees and costs of $347,919.89,” the complaint said. “As a result of defendants' breach of the engagement agreement, plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of the unpaid legal fees and costs.”
In recent years, Depp has litigated fiercely against both Bloom Hergott and his former financial advisers at The Management Group. While TMG settled with Depp last year, both defendants have said Depp's profligate spending—not their fees—are to blame for his financial troubles, which they said were more significant than one might expect for an actor who commands tens of millions of dollars per film.
In a statement, a Buckley spokesman expressed dissatisfaction over having to sue the firm's ex-client.
“Given the outstanding litigation result we achieved for Mr. Depp last summer, we were disappointed to have to file an action to collect fees he owes us,” the spokesman said.
Benjamin Chew of Brown Rudnick and Adam Waldman of Endeavor Law, two of Depp's lawyers, didn't immediately respond to comment requests Tuesday. Chew brought Depp to Brown Rudnick as a client when he joined the firm from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips last year.
Buckley—known as Buckley Sandler until earlier this year—is representing itself in the case, led by Los Angeles partner John C. Redding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Roadblock to Opportunity: Rethinking Client Conflict Processes in Lateral Partner Recruiting
8 minute readDLA Piper Names Corporate Lawyer Gerry Williams as Co-US Managing Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250