The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, ruling that a law firm under investigation for allegedly violating telemarketing rules must comply with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s demands, has turned back a challenge to the constitutionality of the agency’s structure.

The court affirmed a district court’s ruling ordering Seila Law’s compliance with the CFPB’s civil investigative demand (CID), rejecting the law firm’s arguments that the bureau is unconstitutionally structured and that it had no authority to issue the CID.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]