Lobbyist Sam Patten, Charged in Mueller Spinoff Case, Gets 3 Years' Probation
A federal judge in Washington sentenced Patten to three years of probation and ordered him to pay a $5,000 fine.
April 12, 2019 at 10:40 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 11:19 a.m.
Sam Patten, a Washington lobbyist and onetime associate of Paul Manafort, avoided prison time Friday on a charge that he failed to disclose past consulting work for a Ukrainian political party, as a federal judge in Washington sentenced him to three years of probation and ordered him to pay a $5,000 fine.
His sentencing before U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson came eight months after he pleaded guilty to violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law requiring the disclosure of U.S.-based lobbying for foreign governments and other interests. After decades of lax enforcement, the law returned to prominence in the prosecution of Manafort, who pleaded guilty last year to charges related to his own lobbying for Ukraine.
Patten pleaded guilty to communicating with U.S. lawmakers on behalf of the Opposition Bloc, a Russia-aligned political party in Ukraine, without disclosing that work to the Justice Department as required under FARA. Prosecutors alleged Patten sought to arrange for his Russian business partner and a member of the Opposition Bloc, identified in court papers as a “prominent Ukrainian oligarch,” to meet with members of Congress and their staffs.
As part of the plea deal, Patten also admitted that he brokered access to Trump's inauguration for a pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarch. The scheme, in which he arranged for a U.S. citizen to serve as a “straw donor” and give $50,000 to Trump's inaugural committee for four tickets to the event, was designed to circumvent the federal prohibition on foreigners contributing funds to such ceremonies.
The special counsel's office referred Patten's case to career federal prosecutors in Washington, who backed the longtime lobbyist's bid for leniency.
On Friday, Patten's defense attorney, Schertler & Onorato partner Stuart Sears, said his client had faced a choice “along the way in this case between his career and assisting the government.
“And he chose his country,” Sears said, adding that Patten had likely sacrificed his career in doing so.
“I think that's an important consideration for the court to take in this case,” he added.
Patten, who'd written a letter to Jackson in advance of Friday's hearing, said he “fully” appreciated the “seriousness of the offense with which I'm charged.”
“I pled guilty. I recognize the serious of my conduct and crimes I committed. I behaved as if the law did not apply to me, and that was wrong,” he said.
Jackson appeared struck by Patten's cooperation but said he had been accused of a number of offenses. “None of them were minor,” she said.
Echoing statements she made at Manafort's sentencing in March, Jackson stressed what she saw as the value of FARA in bringing transparency to the American political process. “The whole point and the only pt of the FARA statute is to ensure transparency in the political process and the legislative process and put people on notice of when a foreign government” is seeking to influence U.S. policy, she said.
“People need the facts for democracy to work,” she said.
But, noting his cooperation with prosecutors and other factors, Jackson said, “there are reasons your sentence is not going to be like [Manafort's] sentence.”
Days before sentencing, prosecutors said Patten should be credited for his cooperation with the Russia investigation, noting that he had been prepared to testify against Manafort in Washington. After he was found guilty of financial fraud in Alexandria, Virginia, Manafort pleaded guilty in Washington federal court to a pair of conspiracy charges connected to his past work for the pro-Russian government of Ukraine.
Patten met with government investigators, either in person or over the phone, on nine separate occasions. And his experience as an overseas political consultant made him a “valuable resource for the government in a number of other criminal investigations,” prosecutors said.
At Friday's sentencing, Jackson appeared miffed by the decision of prosecutors to not recommend a specific sentence for Patten. Prosecutors had declined to provide that specific recommendation, citing in a court filing the “practice of the special counsel's office.”
“I have to say, I'm not exactly sure where the new tradition of demurring instead of making a recommendation comes from. I believe the culprit may be in the courtroom,” she said, in an apparent reference to Andrew Weissmann, a top prosecutor on Mueller's team, who attended the sentencing.
Still, she described the prosecutors' court filing earlier in the week as “extremely supportive” of Patten's request for leniency.
“It is,” said prosecutor Fernando Campoamor-Sanchez.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appellate Court Relies on 'Cancellation Rule' for Expert's Conflicting Testimony
'Entitlement to Information Has Its Limits:' Judge Denies Another Discovery Deadline Extension in Trademark Suit
4 minute readMeet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1City Bar Presents Thomas E. Dewey Awards to Outstanding NYC Prosecutors
- 2NC Solicitor General Park Withdraws His 4th Circuit Nomination
- 3Trump-Appointed Judge Presides Over NASCAR Antitrust Dispute Under Case Reassignment
- 4CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
- 5FIFA Faces Legal Challenge Over Winning Saudi World Cup Bid
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250