Report: In-House Counsel Plan on Switching Firms Over Technology Use
A report by professional services firm BDO USA indicated that in-house counsel are making it a priority to leverage technology and are considering changing outside counsel in the coming months.
April 11, 2019 at 04:20 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Thirty-six percent of legal departments are contemplating leaving their current firms for new outside counsel within the next 12 months, according to a report released earlier this week by professional services firm BDO USA.
The report was created based on the results of a survey to 100 senior in-house lawyers across industries in companies with annual revenues ranging from $100 million to more than $3 billion.
George Socha, managing director at BDO, said he suspects the reason in-house counsel have made the decision to leave their current firms is because of cost savings and the desire for better services.
“In-house counsel are under ever-increasing pressure to reduce their costs,” Socha said. “They are being forced to live and die by metrics in a way that hasn't been the case before.”
Socha further explained that the services they receive for those costs are also playing a factor. Twenty-nine percent of respondents indicated that a lack of innovation is the biggest complaint they have with their firms and 17 percent of respondents said their firms' pricing model is an issue.
The report also indicates that 71 percent of in-house counsel plan on leveraging technology in the next year to streamline legal operations.
“The increasing speed at which the business and legal environments are changing today makes continuous innovation even more an imperative,” said Stephanie Giammarco, BDO's partner and national leader in its technology and business transformation practice.
“They are much more concerned about results, about costs and factors like that than they are about the specific technology used by the other law firms,” Socha said.
Socha said while technology use plays an important role in firm selection, in-house counsel want to make sure that technology is used effectively and efficiently. He said firms are now expected to use technology that in-house counsel has in place. Socha explained that when legal departments have their own technology in place, they can easily view matters and have more control over the data.
“It gives you a much better ability to control the risks of having data go to different locations,” Socha said.
The report also indicated that 54 percent of all respondents said the biggest legal risks with respect to data is a breach.
“From the EU's recently enacted General Data Protection Regulation to a potential U.S. national data privacy law, to hundreds of other regulations at the state and local levels, corporate counsel will not only have to deal with the increasing quantity and complexity of compliance obligations, but also greater standards of accountability and transparency of them from external stakeholders,” Giammarco said.
Because of new regulations such as the GDPR, 59 percent of respondents indicated that they have updated their data privacy notices. Twenty-four percent of respondents said improving cybersecurity is a top priority over the next 12 months.
Socha said aside from regulators looming over companies who do not comply with data privacy laws, companies face higher insurance premiums, reputational risks and this “provides opportunity for someone to bring litigation under any number of causes of action.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Are Adopting Gen AI Five Times Faster Than the Cloud
Kaufman Dolowich Managing Partner Navigates Chancery Best Practices as She Builds Team
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250