Alito and Kagan Will Face House Members at Supreme Court Budget Hearing
For years, the court's budget hearing was a major event, not because of budget minutiae but because it fostered a rare unscripted dialogue between the legislative and judicial branches.
March 01, 2019 at 11:54 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Justices Elena Kagan (left) and Samuel Alito (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM)
For the first time since 2015, two Supreme Court justices next week will go before a U.S. House of Representatives committee hearing to answer questions about the court's budget, an occasion that members of Congress have used in the past to raise a range of other issues.
Justices Samuel Alito Jr. and Elena Kagan will represent the court at the hearing March 7 before the House Appropriations subcommittee on financial services and general government. There was no reason given for why Alito and Kagan are attending, but the court itself has a budget committee, and they are likely to be members.
The House subcommittee is headed by Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Illinois, who has long pushed for Supreme Court transparency, including allowing cameras in the court. Quigley did not immediately respond to a call for comment, but the resumption of public hearings for the Supreme Court's budget may be chalked up to the House coming under Democratic control in January. Quigley was ranking member of the committee before this year.
Evan Hollander, spokesman for the House Appropriations Committee, said in a statement:
“While a public hearing has not occurred in recent years, the Appropriations Committee is pleased that Justices Alito and Kagan will appear before the Financial Services and General Government subcommittee next week. Hearing from witnesses about budget requests is a key function of the Appropriations Committee, and we look forward to resuming this important practice with the Supreme Court.”
For years, the court's budget hearing was a major event, not because of budget minutiae but because it fostered a rare unscripted dialogue between the legislative and judicial branches on issues ranging from recusal policies to the dearth of minority law clerks.
But the hearings were called off starting in 2016, the result of purported scheduling conflicts. In 2017, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer met with the subcommittee in private.
“The Supreme Court budget hearing had been one of the few times all year in which Americans could see the justices with their own eyes and not have to rely on outmoded means, like courtroom sketches, to trust that these public servants were, in fact, serving,” said Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, which advocates for Supreme Court transparency.
Roth added: “It's unfortunate that this practice went underground for three years, but I'm pleased that the justices will return to public view next week. After all, the high court receives about $100 million of our money each year. It would be nice to learn how it plans to spend it.”
Read more:
'Hard to Predict' Court Dynamics Sans Swing Justice, Kagan Says
Shut Out: SCOTUS Law Clerks Still Mostly White and Male
Chief Justice Roberts Rebuffs Trump After He Criticizes Judges Again
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Hogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care
3 minute read
Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC

Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
3 minute read
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
- 2NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 3Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed With Caution
- 4DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 5Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250