In a previous article posted on, I discussed the findings of late 2018 survey I conducted on the state of innovation in the legal market. At the end of the survey, to delve deeper into the DNA of the data, I ask for demographic information (firm size, revenue, footprint, revenue per lawyer, etc.) and/or the name of their firm so that I might fill in the data, myself. This allows me to compare data across demographic strata in hopes of finding “best practices” or gaps where improvements can be made. Specifically, I wanted to compare answers in three areas: (i) the various employment classes – leadership versus partners versus associates, (ii) RPL – “lower” versus “higher” and (iii) geographic footprint – international/global, domestic and regional. We’ll start with the classes.

Homogeneity of the Classes – Leadership, Partners and Associates

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]