Survey: 69 Percent of People Would Use Online Legal Services Over Attorneys
The survey found most Americans are willing to trade off a traditional lawyer experience for small legal matters if it saves them a few bucks. Respondents said they would be comfortable using an online-based alternative.
December 12, 2018 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
A new survey has found that many American adults are willing to use alternative legal providers as a way to save on legal costs.
Over 2,000 U.S. adults answered the online survey earlier this month. The survey was conducted by the Harris Poll at the request of Your Lawyers Online, an online legal service provider that guides clients through family, animal and estate planning law.
According to the findings, 82 percent of respondents said they wanted alternatives to traditional lawyers when dealing with small legal matters, such as making a will and document review. In addition, 76 percent of respondents aged 18 to 54 said they were willing to use online legal services if it could save them money. By contrast, only 65 percent of those aged 55-plus said they would consider using alternative legal services.
There was a similar discrepancy between groups with different incomes. Seventy-two percent of surveyed households with income below $100,000 said they would likely use online legal services, while only 62 percent of those with incomes above $100,000 said the same.
Likewise, though 55 percent of people in households earning less that $50,000 said an online lawyer could provide anonymity needed for a sensitive legal matter, less than half (47 percent) of households earning $100,000-plus agreed.
However, even higher earners found not all legal matters needed a lawyer, or perhaps their costly fees. Of surveyed households that earn over $100,000, 79 percent said they “wish” there was an alternative to traditional lawyers.
A legal trends report released earlier this year by Clio, a cloud-based legal service provider, found similar results. When Clio asked consumers what would influence them to not seek legal solutions for their problems, 35 said the benefits are not worth the money, and 31 percent said it cost too much.
The popularity of LegalZoom, a web-based legal service provider, gives some credence to such survey findings. Indeed, consumer-facing legal services are raising venture capital funding, including LegalZoom's mammoth $500 million investment raised earlier this year.
The likes of LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer create legally enforceable documents for users for a comprehensive fee. Other services, however, help consumers solve their legal matters for no fee. Do Not Pay is one app, for example, that allows users to fight traffic court violations, claim class action settlement money, file a small claims court claim and other civil court actions for free, offering users different avenues and price points to solve legal matters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
University of Chicago Accused of Evicting Student for Attending Gaza-Israel Protest
3 minute readState Appellate Court Rejects Reasoning for Attorney's Removal From Conservatorship
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250