Alleged Russian Trolls Fight Back With a Suit Against Facebook
A Russian organization whose members have been accused of meddling in the 2016 election sued Facebook on Tuesday, claiming its page was unfairly removed from the platform.
November 20, 2018 at 06:49 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A Russian organization whose accountant was indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice earlier this year has sued Facebook, claiming its page was a legitimate news source that the social media company unfairly removed.
In a suit filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the Federal Agency of News and its general director, Evgeniy Zubarev, sought damages and an injunction preventing Facebook from deleting its page. Facebook deleted the FAN page in April during a sweep of Russian accounts linked to the Internet Research Agency, which has been accused of meddling in the 2016 election.
Christopher Sullivan, a San Francisco-based partner at Diamond McCarthy, is representing FAN. Neither he nor Facebook immediately responded to requests for comment.
St. Petersburg, Russia-based FAN said it is a “legitimate news agency” and that the only similarity it has with the IRA is that the two organizations used to share a building and the groups' ”national origin and that of their members.” FAN said it has been wrongfully accused of being part of U.S. election-focused “Project Lakhta.”
“FAN is not an entity within 'Project Lakhta' and has no relationship with 'Project Lakhta,' the IRA or Glavset,” FAN said in the suit. “To the contrary, FAN is a news gathering and dissemination organization. In that capacity, FAN gathers news from conventional sources and adheres to journalistic standards in its operations.”
FAN also addressed the indictment of its accountant Elena Khusyaynova in October over alleged involvement with the IRA. The group said the accountant could not exercise “authority over the editorial content.” FAN also said it believed it was Khusyaynova's sole employer.
The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election has also alleged Zubarev's predecessor, FAN founder and first general director Aleksandra Yurievna Krylova, was an employee of the IRA. FAN said it has “no knowledge of this allegation” or its accuracy.
FAN said it has “never created a fictitious name or user account” or “knowingly created a false or misleading news article.”
Facebook banned FAN on April 3, alleging the group violated its terms of service. The California-based company has faced criticism in recent months over its handling of Russian election interference and delayed removal of Russian trolls. According to the suit, FAN was banned the same day as hundreds of other Russian pages the platform claimed were linked to the IRA.
FAN claims it is one of the most visited sites in Russia, and that by blocking it, Facebook has kept Russian residents from accessing information.
“Despite overwhelming evidence that it was wrong in its conclusions, Facebook continued to and continues to ban FAN from Facebook and access to hundreds of thousands of Russians who obtained their news from FAN,” FAN said in the suit. “In fact, Facebook, while claiming to protect the public from 'fake news' is actually engaging in censorship and denying FAN subscribers of access to a legitimate news organization.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJoseph Saveri Law Firm, Co-Counsel File 9th Circuit Appeal in Lawsuit Targeting GitHub's Use of Code to Train AI Models
GCs Face Peril as Foreign Bribery Probes Second-Guess 'Routine' Advice
14-State Coalition Sues TikTok, Alleging Addictive Algorithms Trigger Mental Health Harms in Adolescents
NY Federal Judge Rules Online-Only Retailers Cannot Face ADA Claims
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Joseph G. Petrosinelli, C. Bryan Wilson and Angela Pyo of Williams & Connolly have entered appearances for Motive Technologies in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in California Northern District Court by Shaw Keller LLP and Kirkland & Ellis on behalf of Samsara Inc., assets three patents related to dashcam video footage technology. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge James Donato, is 4:24-cv-06049, Samsara Inc. v. Motive Technologies Inc.
Who Got The Work
Moez M. Kaba, Christina Von der Ahe Rayburn, Dennis Ojogho and Yegor Fursevich from Hueston Hennigan have entered appearances for Amazon.com in a pending trade secrets lawsuit. The complaint was filed Aug. 26 in New York Southern District Court by Merchant & Gould on behalf of Select Research Ltd., a 3-D body imaging developer involved in the use of human health calculator body volume index (BVI). The suit contends that Amazon improperly embodied and incorporated SRL's trade secrets in their 'Halo' and 'Made For You' products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman, is 7:24-cv-06419, Select Research Ltd. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Irell & Manella have stepped in to defend Foresight Diagnostics in a pending trade secrets lawsuit. The action, which is sealed, was filed Aug. 29 in California Northern District Court by Richards, Layton & Finger and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eumi K. Lee, is 5:24-cv-06117, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al v. Foresight Diagnostics Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
David A. Robinson, John F. Wood and Brendan H. Connors from Holland & Knight and attorneys from Proskauer Rose have entered appearances for Scientific Drilling International, S. Westley Shedd, Pamela Pierce and other defendants, respectively, in a pending shareholder lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 29 in California Central District Court by Umhofer, Mitchell & King on behalf of Matthew D. Van Steenwyk and Gretchen M. Van Steenwyk-Marsh. The suit accuses the controlling shareholder of Scientific Drilling of self-dealing. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, is 2:24-cv-07401, Matthew D. Van Steenwyk et al v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk et al.
Who Got The Work
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete partners Laura A. Balson and Ashley L. Orler have entered appearances for Avfuel Corporation in a pending data breach class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Kopelowitz Ostrow PA, centers on a 2024 cyberattack that allegedly exposed the personally identifying and private data of 'potentially billions of individuals.' The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, is 2:24-cv-12274, Clark III v. Avfuel Corporation.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250