Northwestern Law Is Paring Back Amid Budget Woes. Are Other Elite Schools Next?
Experts and law deans say highly ranked law schools are generally faring better than their lower-ranked counterparts, even if a few big names such as Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and the University of Minnesota Law School have said they are facing financial shortfalls.
November 08, 2018 at 02:44 PM
8 minute read
The recent decision to trim staff and lecture faculty at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law amid a budget shortfall illustrates that even elite law schools are subject to the financial pressures of staying competitive in a soft legal education market.
But make no mistake: Name-brand law schools on the whole are faring better than their counterparts further down the legal education food chain.
That's according to experts who have studied the changing economics of law schools and deans at several schools within U.S. News & World Report's top 20, who say that fundraising has been strong and that the financial shortfalls that emerged in the midst of the so-called crisis in legal education have largely been addressed. Put another way, don't expect top law schools to announce drastic cuts any time soon.
Even Northwestern's cutbacks are relatively modest, according to Dean Kimberly Yuracko, who declined to specify the amount of the school's funding shortfall except to note that its operating expenses are projected to outpace revenue this year. Still, she characterized the school as being in a “challenging financial position” in a message to faculty in September.
The school has opted to eliminate some vacant staff positions and not renew the yearly contracts of certain clinicians and lecturers, she said, positioning the reductions as a routine adjustment amid her new leadership. Yuracko assumed the deanship in September. (No tenured positions are being cut.)
At the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, the books are looking better than they have in years, with the wider campus recovering from a $125 million deficit several years ago, according to Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.
“The bottom line is that we are in very good financial shape,” Chemerinsky said. “We had no cuts for the current fiscal year and had some increases—we hired four new academic tenure track faculty, a new clinical professor, a new legal writing professor, and some new staff. We have created a number of new programs since I arrived last year. I expect for next fiscal year that we will be hiring about six new faculty and do not expect any budget or staff cuts.”
Law deans are generally loath to discuss their finances publicly—a number of deans at top law schools declined to comment on their funding outlooks for this article—but new research from a pair of legal academics and an economist offers some insight into how elite schools have fared in comparison to lower-ranked schools.
Former University of North Carolina law professor Bernie Burk and University of St. Thomas School of Law professor Jerome Organ examined enrollment, tuition and scholarship trends in legal education from 2010 to 2016 to conclude that the nation's law schools are collectively losing $1.5 billion annually due to lower enrollment and lower actual cost for students.
But their paper highlights the fact that not all law schools are feeling the pain equally. They found that the top third of law schools on average are forgoing $5.9 million annually in tuition, compared with an average $11.6 million for the middle third and an average $12.2 million for the bottom third.
Moreover, the average first-year class at those top schools fell 13 percent—much less than the 35 percent and 46 percent in the second and third cohorts of schools. In short, top law schools haven't reduced their class sizes or upped their scholarships to the degree that lower-ranked schools have; hence, they haven't taken as big of financial hits.
However, different law schools within the top tier face different circumstances, Burk noted in an interview this week.
“Generally speaking, the most prestigious law schools have been the least affected by the change in circumstances,” he said. “But there are a couple in the top 20 that have found themselves required to discount their tuition fairly substantially in order to maintain the profile of the student body they want to have, and Northwestern was one of them. Washington University in St. Louis also discounted heavily.”
Washington University Law Dean Nancy Staudt said in an interview Wednesday that her school's finances are solid and that no cuts are planned.
“We're great,” she said. “We're in an operating surplus. There is no problem at all in our finances. I was a little surprised by Northwestern's move. Between five and seven years ago, virtually every school and dean I talked to had some financial difficulty. But for the most part, those financial difficulties have been addressed. I just know our finances and we're in a building mode—certainly not a cutting back mode.”
➤➤ Stay on top of developments and trends in legal education with Ahead of the Curve by Karen Sloan, a new weekly briefing from Law.com. Sign up here and get next week's email update straight to your inbox.
Organ, at St. Thomas, theorized that Northwestern's financial problems may be the result of fierce competition for highly qualified students among highly ranked law schools in the Midwest—at least partially. Not only is the school in competition with the No. 4-ranked University of Chicago Law School in town, but it's also competing with the relatively close University of Michigan Law School; Washington University in St. Louis School of Law, the University of Notre Dame Law School; the University of Iowa College of Law; the University of Wisconsin Law School; Indiana University Maurer School of Law; and the University of Illinois College of Law. Illinois and Indiana in particular have been generous with scholarships, which may have helped lure applicants away from Northwestern despite its higher ranking, Organ said.
“Even a school like Northwestern has to fight with its competitors to attract the students it wants,” he said. “Harvard and Yale and Stanford, largely, are in their own world. But Duke, Northwestern, Virginia, Chicago—they've all taken slightly smaller classes, and I think they've all increased either the number of people receiving scholarship or the size of scholarships. They'll all in a competitive fight for that certain profile of student.”
The case of the University of Minnesota offers further evidence that some top law schools have financial issues. The central university has pumped nearly $40 million into its law school since 2012 to make up for revenue lost due to smaller enrollment. That move has allowed to school to maintain its No. 20 ranking, but it is costing the university $7.5 million a year.
Organ and Burk's research doesn't address one key issue, however, which is the non-tuition revenue sources that each law school has. That includes subsidies from central universities, fundraising and endowments. But elite law schools in general enjoy larger endowments and a higher capacity to fundraise, Burk said, which can help insulate them from financial woes.
“In general, the more prestigious you are, the more you are inherently likely to attract students who prove to be successful in the world, financially, and the more alumni you have that really hit it big,” he said.
Even so, fundraising success can't necessarily stave off operating shortfalls. Northwestern has raised nearly $250 million in its latest capital campaign, but Yuracko said much of that funding is earmarked by donors and can't be used to fill in holes in the operating budget.
The good news for top law schools is that last year's 8 percent increase in the national applicant was concentrated among those with LSAT scores of 160 and higher—the students they aim to attract. Organ predicts that increase will translate not only into more students at elite schools, but a reduction in the scholarships schools have been using to lure highly credentialed applicants. And that, in turn, should ease any budget strains.
“My guess is that with an increase in supply, the competition for students goes down and not as much scholarship money is on the table,” he said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
Attorneys, Professors Share Support for Chancellor Following Musk's Online Attacks
4 minute readVisa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Trending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250