California Lawyers Association Grants Members Free Access to Fastcase
CLA believes that tech tools like legal research platform Fastcase could help state bar associations attract young new members.
October 23, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
It sure beats a free T-shirt. Early next year, members of the California Lawyers Association (CLA) will receive complimentary access to Fastcase, a legal research platform chock-full of case laws, statutes and regulations from the federal level on down to all 50 states. As bar associations across the country look for bait to draw young and upcoming lawyers into the fold, dangling a law library that can fit inside the screen of their smartphones might be a good place to start.
Here are the particulars: CLA's Fastcase service will include unlimited research, reference and printing (because even in a digital world, paper still has a place). Starting in early 2019, members will be able to log-in via the organization's website using their bar username and password.
CLA took an interest in Fastcase once they found out that other state bar associations had begun offering their members similar research benefits.
“By doing this I think we all just felt that it would be a great tool for young attorneys and solo and small firms in particular. … For the small and solo law firms, they don't have the resources to get a subscription to Lexis,” Tara Burd, head of CLA's Online Research and Publications Service Committee, said.
Fastcase CEO Ed Walters notes that his company is focusing on state bar organizations and the members they are hoping to attract. And it's had some success: Fastcase is already the provider of choice to bar associations in 31 states and the District of Columbia.
“One trend across the country is that bar associations are really competing to offer the highest value to their members, especially voluntary bar associations. You have to win young lawyers; you have to really show that there's a value when you write that check for your dues,” Walters said.
And when it comes to numbers with dollar signs in front of them, “zero” might have the highest value of all to young lawyers—especially in light of the fact that an “Appellate” level membership to Fastcase, for example, costs $695 a year.
Walters understands the gravitational pull that complimentary access to his service could exert on lawyers who may have previously been on the fence about forking over the dues required to join a state bar association in the vein of the CLA.
“There are hundreds of thousands of lawyers in the state of California who are paying thousands or tens of thousands of dollars a year for research, and a simple fact is lots of lawyers would rather spend that money building their business or doing more pro-bono work,” Walters said.
The service was put through a demo testing process alongside several other legal research providers before CLA evaluators would sign-off on the partnership. But Fastcase's holistic approach to the law—they've added 400 new legal treatises in the last year—eventually scored it the gig. Burd pointed out that the service's database didn't just focus on modern casework, but also the history that laid its foundation.
“For a new practitioner, they may not quite understand the value of that, but there's a lot of value in going back and looking at how a statute came to be. You have to be able to research that, and so it was important to us to not give our members, especially our younger members, a false sense of comfort, like they had done all of their due diligence when there's actually a lot more out there,” Burd said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Eversheds Sutherland Moving After 36 Years to Smaller Atlanta Office
4 minute readAs Costs and Workloads Mount, Law Departments Turn to Tech and Workflow Overhauls
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
- 2Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 3The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 4Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 5Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250