Critical Mass: Ominous Order for Opioid Defendants
Also this week: A hard to swallow LaCroix class action, and Feds probing asbestos trust.
October 10, 2018 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing on class actions and mass torts. Here's what's happening: A judge allowed most of the claims in a key opioid case to go forward. Controversy over a LaCroix class action bubbles over. And find out what the DOJ wants from this asbestos trust.
Send your feedback to [email protected], or find me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.
➤➤ Would you like to receive Critical Mass as an email? Sign up here for a trial.
Key Opioid Order Comes Down
A judge's report in a key case over the opioid epidemic could have a big impact on the multidistrict litigation, which has surpassed 1,200 lawsuits. U.S. Magistrate Judge David Ruiz's report and recommendation on Friday allowed most of the claims, including racketeering and fraud, to go forward.
Ruiz isn't the first judge to address dismissal motions in an opioid litigation, and his report comes in a single case in Ohio. But, if adopted, it could impact many more cases waiting in the wings, with motions to dismiss pending.
Among them: A pair of cases brought by two Native American tribes. On Friday, 448 of the 573 “federally recognized tribes” filed an amicus brief opposing motions to dismiss those cases. Coming so close to Columbus/Indigenous Peoples Day, it's a timely read:
“In many ways, the opioid epidemic has become yet another painful reenactment of past harm and abuse inflicted on Indian Country, compounding historical trauma from which Tribal Nations have not fully healed,” the brief says. “That history should not be repeated here, and these actions should not be dismissed.”
When asked about Ruiz's report, Timothy Purdon (Robins Kaplan), one of the lawyers representing the tribes in the amicus brief, told me: “We're optimistic and hopeful the claims of those two tribes will overcome the motions and move forward.”
Fizzy Water Case Gets a Lot of Buzz
A class action has alleged that LaCroix sparkling water isn't “all natural,” or “100% natural,” as its label says, but contains synthetic compounds used in cockroach insecticide. Here's the complaint, which demands that National Beverage Corp.change the labels on its popular drinks.
Beaumont Costales filed the case on Oct. 1. But consumers haven't stopped talking about it, prompting National Beverage to chastise what it called a “false” and “defamatory” lawsuit over which it would “seek actual and punitive damages.” Michael King, special corporate counsel for National Beverage, added: “There are neither sugars nor artificial ingredients contained in, nor added to, our LaCroix products. All of our ingredients are certified as natural.”
Maybe grab a coconut water instead? In fact, a federal judge just dismissed a class action alleging that Vita Coco's “Born in Brazil” slogan misled consumers into believing that its coconuts came from Brazil. Vita Coco attorney Melissa Pallett-Vasquez (Bilzin Sumberg) had this amusing remark about the faults of the case, according to my colleague Raychel Lean's story:
“In one of the depositions, a woman took everything that was on the package as absolute truth, including a catchy phrase that said, 'More potassium than a banana (don't tell the monkeys).' I inquired as to whether or not she thought that Vita Coco was asking her to talk to monkeys, or not to tell the monkeys, and she said, 'Yes, I do.' ”
The DOJ's Asbestos Act
Fraud allegations in asbestos bankruptcy trusts aren't new. But on Oct. 1, the trust for defunct asbestos manufacturer DII Industries posted this update on its website saying it had suspended payments after the U.S. Justice Departmenthanded it a “civil investigative demand.” The DOJ wants information about settlement agreements with the trust's claimants.
The announcement spurred reaction from tort reformers like Lisa Rickard, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Institute for Legal Reform, who said: “Evidence of fraud and abuse in asbestos litigation and bankruptcy claims has been evident for years, and we applaud efforts by the Department of Justice to take this corruption seriously.”
It also comes as a midyear report by consulting firm KCIC found asbestos filingscontinue to plummet: They fell 14 percent this year when when compared to the same period in 2017.
Who Got the Work?
Covington & Burling's Paul Schmidt scored big wins for pharmaceutical companies this month. Schmidt and Covington's Michael Imbroscio, along with Robert Simpson (Shipman & Goodwin) and Sharla Frost (Tucker Ellis), won their third jury verdict on Friday for Boehringer Ingelheim in a Connecticut trial over blood thinner Pradaxa (plaintiff's attorney was Brian Perkins of Meyers & Flowers). And, on Oct. 3, Schmidt, with Edward Dauber (Greenberg Dauber), won a ruling for Hoffmann-La Roche: the New Jersey Supreme Court dismissed 500 cases brought over anti-acne drug Accutane. (David Buchanan of Seeger Weiss was plaintiff's attorney).
Here's what else is happening:
Chesley Chapter Closes: The law firm of disbarred Cincinnati plaintiff's attorney Stan Chesley has agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by hundreds of former clients. The case dates back to 2014, when a Kentucky judge found that Chesley's firm, defunct Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley, owed clients $42 million after pocketing much of a $200 million settlement of litigation over diet drug fen-phen. Earlier this year, the 6th Circuit refused to unfreeze the assets. A judgment filed last week in the case was for $19.2 million plus interest. The Cincinnati Enquirer pegged the total at $23.5 million.
Green Light: A federal judge in the Volkswagen emissions litigation refused to dismiss a case brought on behalf of people who sold their cars before the scandal erupted in 2015. Here's my story. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said the case brought “relatively unique allegations” that those car owners suffered economic damages. He also allowed racketeering claims to go forward against software company Robert Bosch.
No MGM MDL: MGM lost its bid to coordinate a dozen lawsuits brought over last year's mass shooting in Las Vegas (most of which MGM filed against the victims). The MDL panel, however, ordered 20+ price fixing lawsuits against broadcasters Tribune and Sinclair, plus, a new lawsuit that retailer Bon-Ton filed on Friday, to Illinois. And an MDL request for 85 lawsuits alleging that firefighting foam has caused residents to get sick just got another case: The city of Dayton, Ohio, filed a lawsuit last week over Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass. See you next week!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Walt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
- 2The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
- 3Is 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
- 4Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
- 5Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250