An Inside Job: Business Development for Associates
Instead of focusing on solving the problems of someone outside of the firm, find opportunities to serve someone within the firm and impress an influential partner.
October 10, 2018 at 04:04 PM
7 minute read
For many years, it was widely accepted that law schools failed to teach practice management and business development skills that are essential for lawyers to learn to become successful. Things have changed significantly in recent years.
Law schools are implementing curriculum and programs that address the business issues law students will face when they become practicing lawyers. While this is a big step forward, and students are graduating more prepared than ever before, the reality is that most aspects of business development cannot be taught in the classroom.
The skills attorneys must practice to develop a book of business must be acquired in the real world, through observation, trial and error. Especially error. Yes, business development is mostly about failure, which is one of the main reasons that many lawyers, who are competitive and like to win, don't relish the business development process.
If you talk to any successful professional who consistently engages in business development activity, they will tell you that they lose the sale far more often than they win it. But there's a bright side to losing. With every failure comes the chance to learn and adapt. Experienced attorneys are not discouraged by unsuccessful efforts. They see each “failure” as an opportunity to get better and draw lessons from the experience to help guide their future actions. This shift, which requires a growth mindset, leads to more business development activity, not less, and ultimately more success.
For young, relatively inexperienced attorneys at law firms with high billing rates and sophisticated corporate clients, the challenge is that most are not in a position to be pitching their services. They haven't yet developed the skill set, judgment and management skills necessary to develop business at this level. Spending much, if any, precious time chasing work during one's first few years of practice is a misallocation of resources.
Focus on the Little Things
You will have to develop business at some point to advance and make partner, but you don't want to spin your wheels going after business you will never catch. At this point in your career, you're just getting comfortable playing a supporting role to other attorneys, and you are not ready to be the headliner just yet. Learn to do the little things well before worrying about the big things. It's often the little things that make the biggest difference.
Brian McCarthy is the managing partner of the Los Angeles office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. As part of the research for my most recent book, I spoke to McCarthy about the steps he took to stand out as a young lawyer, and he shared a story that punctuates the importance of focusing on the little things.
Early in his career, McCarthy worked on a deal with a partner who was perceived to be difficult. Rather than accepting the challenging nature of the working relationship, McCarthy set out to improve it. An opportunity for improvement arose when the partner went out of town and McCarthy took it upon himself to read all of the major newspapers and clip out (yes, pre-internet days) every news story that he could find that mentioned the partner's clients. He assembled the news stories in a binder and had them waiting for the partner upon his return so that when he came back to the office he was thoroughly up to speed. By taking the initiative, the partner's perception of McCarthy and the dynamic of their working relationship changed dramatically.
Instead of focusing on solving the problems of someone outside of the firm, McCarthy looked for an opportunity to serve someone within the firm, which allowed him to impress an influential partner in the firm. This story highlights an important principle for young lawyers: While most experienced attorneys should engage in lots of entrepreneurship with a focus on developing relationships outside of the firm, junior attorneys should actively engage in entrepreneurship with their colleagues inside the firm. McCarthy's experience assembling news clippings that mentioned a partner's clients is an excellent example of this type of internal entrepreneurship. It's called “intrapreneurship.”
Intrapreneurship in this context is a focus on personal brand-building activities within a law firm. It means elevating your reputation among colleagues through internally focused initiatives. It's engaging in activities that allow you to hone the skills and characteristics, such as strong writing and presentation skills, good judgment and confidence that you will need when it's time to compete for work in the business world.
Accordingly, if partnership is your objective, your intrapreneurial activities will give your colleagues—who are often geographically dispersed—a better understanding of you than by mere impersonal metrics such as hours billed and fees generated. They'll be more likely to want to staff you on their engagements, include you when it comes time to pitch client work and be aware of your strengths when called upon to make decisions related to your advancement within the firm.
Focusing on intrapreneurship reflects an understanding of how business gets generated by most lawyers at law firms. Obviously, business comes from relationships with potential clients and referral sources outside of the firm. But lawyers can also generate a great deal of business from colleagues within their firms.
For example, lawyers will leave your firm to go to another one and become referral sources. Others will go in-house and be in a position to send you business directly. Build a strong reputation among your colleagues and someday you may work for them in an attorney-client engagement. Impress lots of people internally, and you'll be well-positioned to inherit clients from other lawyers when they retire, move in-house, or otherwise transition out of the firm. The more people you reach through your intrapreneurial activities, the stronger your brand will be and the more success you'll have.
Intrapreneurship Requires Hard Work and Creativity
There are countless ways to practice intrapreneurship and build your personal brand within your law firm. Here are a few ideas.
Most firms have associate committees. Get involved.
- Pro bono opportunities are abundant, and pro bono success stories get celebrated within most firms. Take on a matter and do an excellent job.
- Firms publish numerous newsletters and blogs but often lack writing and editing resources to keep up with demands for content. Write great content yourself. Better yet, co-author an article with a partner and take charge of the process.
- Many firms utilize outdated or inefficient processes or procedures when it comes to things like project management and internal and external communication. Come up with an innovative alternative.
- Most associates hunker down in their offices, waiting for opportunities to find them. Seek them out instead by walking the halls and interacting with partners. Find out who is pitching for work and offer to help out.
- There are countless training and educational opportunities for associates at most firms. Learn and grow.
- Firms are filled with smart, ambitious people who can support your career. Build a scene.
- All firms have rainmakers who have business development figured out. Network with them, observe them and mimic their habits and behaviors.
- Like McCarthy, look for opportunities to keep colleagues informed about a client or an industry. Become a valuable resource.
You may not be seasoned enough to generate business from a Fortune 500 company at this point in your career, but there are plenty of opportunities to be an intrapreneur and add value within your firm. Get active and involved. This will serve you well when you're ready to start developing your own book of business.
Jay Harrington is an executive coach and trainer for lawyers and law firms, and is the author of the new book, “The Essential Associate: Step Up, Stand Out, and Rise to the Top as a Young Lawyer.” He is the owner of Harrington Communications, and is associated with Simier Partners. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAvoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
6 minute read'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
Trending Stories
- 1Will Madrid Become the Next Arbitration Hub?
- 2‘Ripe for SCOTUS’: Ruling Creates Circuit Split on NLRB’s Expanded Monetary Remedies
- 3'They Are Never Going to Learn': Geico Not Protected by Litigation Privilege
- 4Supreme Court Takes Up Case Over Approval of Religious Charter School
- 5Gifts of Interest in Charitable LLCs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250