Women-Owned Law Firms Surge Amid Gender Disparity in the Profession
By founding their own firms, women are crafting new game rules that provide for fair compensation, equal promotions, full inclusion and better career development opportunities.
October 09, 2018 at 01:08 PM
7 minute read
Work-life balance is often pegged as the reason women leave traditional law firms. But for the growing number of women establishing their own firms, their departure is often rooted more deeply in gender inequality in the profession than in raising children or having more free time.
“If women were feeling valued, were getting properly rewarded for their efforts, were getting their fair share and it wasn't a constant struggle to get your origination credit, and feel you are part of the team—then you would stay,” said Nicole Galli, who in 2017 co-founded a trade association, Women Owned Law, which has already grown to 200 members.
Also growing in membership is the Women's Business Enterprise National Council, which doles out the prestigious Women's Business Enterprise certification. It currently certifies 300 law firms, and just 11 percent of those law firms have held their certifications for 10 years or more. A full 50 percent of them just earned certification within the past five years. Among the 300 WBE-certified law firms, 16 percent were newly founded within the past five years, according to council spokeswoman Jessica Carlson.
|
➤ View related data: Is Big Law Making Progress on Gender Diversity
Another long-established national trade association, the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms, has also seen a surge in membership. It's grown by 54 percent over the past four years, from 125 to 193 firms—half are women-owned and half are minority-owned, said CEO Joel Stern of Chicago. The nationwide increase is probably higher since many of women-owned firms aren't part of NAMWOLF, which sets a high bar for membership qualifications, he noted.
By founding their own firms, women are crafting new game rules that provide for fair compensation, equal promotions, full inclusion and better career development opportunities.
“There are women further along in their careers—partners in firms—who've done everything 'right.' They leaned in. They figured out the work-life balance, as it is. They made it to a measure of objective success. They have books of business. They have clients. It's still death by a thousand paper cuts. It's still a struggle,” said Galli, managing partner in the Law Offices of N.D. Galli in Philadelphia.
Data shows a mass exodus of female attorneys who leave traditional firms before they reach the upper echelon. The National Association of Women Lawyers found in a 2017 survey that women make up 46 percent of associates but just 30 percent of non-equity partners. Only 19 percent of equity partners are women, the American Bar Association's Commission on Women in the Profession reported in January.
Awareness of the gender inequality problem in the law is increasing, said Stern, at NAMWOLF. At the same time, he said, the options for female Big Law refugees are numerous, from going in-house to starting their own firms to working on a contract basis. NAMWOLF helps its member law firms get business from the nation's largest corporations, which are clambering to increase their supplier diversity by hiring women- and minority-owned law firms, which are pre-vetted by NAMWOLF's membership qualifications.
Female lawyers who launch their own firms find they have more control and room to be entrepreneurial and pursue the clients they really want, Stern said. They create their own law firm cultures and ensure that the implicit biases they faced in Big Law don't follow them.
“They are more likely to practice meritocracy. They are more likely to make sure they are truly giving women equal rights at the firm and paying the women equally. They are most likely to create an environment that's a little more nurturing,” he said.
Jennifer Beckage, founder and managing director of Beckage in Buffalo, New York, said that she and her four female co-founders joined forces to focus on their mutual practice area of technology and privacy protection. Beckage, a former Phillips Lytle partner, said she's noticed an interesting reaction to the fact that her firm is women-owned.
“We've had this incredible support from the legal community and from our local communities, to help support women in this space: women leaders and women in technology and women in law. We know it's important for a lot of companies and individuals,” she said. “It's been neat to watch the community and clients really support us.”
The National Association of Women Lawyers noted in its 2017 report that women attorneys are earning between 90 and 94 percent of what men in the same positions earn. Of the surveyed firms, 97 percent say their highest-paid partner is male, and 69 percent say there is only one woman among the top-10 rainmakers. Female equity partners work just as many hours as male equity partners, but their client billings are 92 percent of the men.
In 2013 when Kelly Culhane of Dallas co-founded Culhane Meadows Haughian & Walsh, a virtual firm with lawyers across the country, she and her co-founders wanted a different way to practice that was fully inclusive regardless of gender, background or race. It wasn't woman-owned in the beginning, but now it's earned a certification as a Woman Business Enterprise, as well as membership in NAMWOLF.
Today, 40 percent of the 57 partners are women, Culhane said. Of the five equity partners, three are women—which comes to 60 percent.
Culhane said that she and her co-founders have crafted a culture at Culhane Meadows that allows partners to have life outside of the law firm. Lawyers are encouraged to take the time they need for a baby's birth, a death in the family, a sick child or simply to attend a kid's basketball game rather than dial in to a 5 p.m. conference call, she said. Another perk for partners—women and men—is that the compensation structure is set by contract, transparent and the same for everyone. Partners keep 80 percent of the money they collect.
“We have a more inviting culture to women because women are the ones who traditionally had to put their lives on hold either to follow their husbands or to have children,” said Culhane, who was previously an associate at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
Galli, who founded Women Owned Law, said that the option of a woman-owned firm allows Big Law refugees to have control over their lives, pursue their great business ideas and ensure they're compensated properly for their contributions. They get control over their practices, treat their clients how they want to treat them, make more money, while also gaining some flexibility for work-life balance. Female founders also focus on supporting the professional development of their women lawyers by helping them find opportunities, encouraging their involvement in different activities and including them in pitches.
Women-owned firms may be more family-friendly for both female and male lawyers, she said, because the women leaders inherently understand and recognize that lawyers' outside lives must function for them to do their best work.
“The women I know are very supportive of those kinds of things. They themselves had to deal with it. I think more importantly, they recognize needing to be there for their kids didn't mean they were not good at and able to do their jobs,” Galli said. “Women have walked the walk of having to balance it all.”
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState High Court Adopts Modern Standard for Who Keeps $70K Engagement Ring After Breakup
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Navigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
- 2Special Section: 2024 Latin America
- 3Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
- 4Justices Hear 'Ancient' Rule About Filing Deadlines, Mob Associate's 25-Year Prison Sentence
- 5Newly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250