Welcome to Skilled in the Art. I’m Law.com IP reporter Scott Graham. Today I’ve got a concrete question about hypothetical negotiations: Should a previous jury verdict involving the same patent be admissible to help a new jury determine damages? There’s $140 million riding on this question, as I’ll explain below. I’ve also got news of the latest and likely futile attempt to soften up Section 101 in the medical diagnostics area, and an update on the Lyft patent infringement case. As always you can email me your thoughts and feedback, and follow me on Twitter.
➤➤ Would you like to receive Skilled in the Art as an email? Learn more.
