Welcome to Skilled in the Art. I’m Law.com IP reporter Scott Graham. Today I’ve got a concrete question about hypothetical negotiations: Should a previous jury verdict involving the same patent be admissible to help a new jury determine damages? There’s $140 million riding on this question, as I’ll explain below. I’ve also got news of the latest and likely futile attempt to soften up Section 101 in the medical diagnostics area, and an update on the Lyft patent infringement case. As always you can email me your thoughts and feedback, and follow me on Twitter.

➤➤ Would you like to receive Skilled in the Art as an email? Learn more. 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]