Debra Katz: Kavanaugh Accuser Is Willing to Testify About Misconduct Claims
"My client will do whatever is necessary to make sure that the Senate Judiciary Committee has the full story and the full set of allegations to allow them to make a fully informed decision," Debra Katz of Washington's Katz, Marshall & Banks said Monday.
September 17, 2018 at 08:35 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated 10:40 a.m.
Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her decades ago in their high school years, is willing to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, her lawyers said Monday.
Debra Katz, the Washington civil rights attorney and an attorney for Ford, said no one from the Senate Judiciary Committee has asked Ford to testify.
“My client will do whatever is necessary to make sure that the Senate Judiciary Committee has the full story and the full set of allegations to allow them to make a fully informed decision,” Katz, of Washington's Katz, Marshall & Banks, said on the news program “CBS This Morning.” “She's willing to do what she needs to do. She's willing, hopefully, to tell her story in a manner that is a fair proceeding.”
Some Senate Republicans are working toward arranging phone conversations with Ford and Kavanaugh, but the news that Ford is willing to testify publicly might make that option more difficult.
Debra Katz, the lawyer of Brett Kavanaugh's accuser, says her client is "willing to do what she needs to do" before the Senate Judiciary Committee as Republicans prepare to grill her over sexual misconduct allegations against the Supreme Court nominee. https://t.co/OEeVP7B0Rs pic.twitter.com/4LVctXpJoE
— CBS News (@CBSNews) September 17, 2018
Katz said Monday on CNN: “We've heard from no one. We've seen various statements made on television—statements that are being bandied about for political reasons. But no one's asked her.”
Another lawyer for Ford, Lisa Banks, also at the firm Katz, Marshall & Banks, told NPR, “She will agree to participate in any proceedings that she's asked to participate in.” She also said that Ford's recollections of the assault were “crystal clear.”
Kavanaugh said in a statement Monday:
“This is a completely false allegation. I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone.
“Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday.
“I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”
Ford, a Palo Alto professor, spoke publicly to The Washington Post in an interview published online Sunday. The claims—that Kavanaugh, then 17, pinned her to a bed at a party and covered her mouth—roiled the confirmation process just days before a scheduled committee vote. Kavanaugh, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, was deemed likely to be confirmed.
Kavanaugh has not publicly addressed the allegations against him. Kavanaugh's backers have pointed to many letters published in recent weeks—as part of the confirmation process—touting Kavanaugh's advocacy for women. Those letters include statements from his former female clerks, praised Kavanaugh for helping end disparities and hardships for women in the law.
Ford first made her claims against Kavanaugh in a letter to her congresswoman. That letter was later transmitted to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, the ranking members on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford asked that she remain anonymous and that her claims be kept confidential.
The first public hint of the controversy came in a report at the Intercept last week that Feinstein was keeping a letter from other members of the Judiciary Committee. In aftermath of that reporting, Ford's claims would be revealed by The New Yorker.
“There was a great deal of ambivalence about whether she wanted to be publicly associated with these allegations,” Katz said Monday. “Essentially that choice was made by her to remain confidential. She asked Sen. Feinstein to keep her letter and her allegations confidential, and Feinstein agreed to do that.”
Katz said some news reporters, aware of Ford's identity, reached out in person to talk with her and emailed and called her. “She knew that her allegations were going to be outed, and that in fact is what occurred,” Katz said Monday. “As a result, she decided to take control of this to tell this in her own voice.”
Read more:
This report was updated to include Kavanaugh's statement Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readUS Fifth Circuit Departs From Sister Courts on Copyright Infringement Damages
4 minute readEx-Girardi Keese CFO Christopher Kamon, Shackled and Sniffing, Pleads Guilty
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250