A federal appeals court has dismissed the only class action brought on behalf of consumers of Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder, concluding that “buyer’s remorse” was not enough to establish standing to sue.

In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found on Thursday that the plaintiff, Mona Estrada, got what she paid for, even though Johnson & Johnson failed to warn consumers that prolonged use of its talcum powder products could cause ovarian cancer.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]