Brett Kavanaugh's SCOTUS Confirmation Hearing Is Set for Sept. 4
The hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination will come less than a month before the start of the next Supreme Court term.
August 10, 2018 at 03:32 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court are scheduled to start on Sept. 4, the committee said Friday.
The hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination will come just weeks before the start of the next term. The first conference day of the coming October term is Sept. 24, and the first day of oral argument is scheduled for Monday, Oct. 1.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said that he wants to confirm Kavanaugh before the start of the October term. With hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination scheduled to begin in the first full week of September, that leaves fewer than 30 days between the opening of the hearings and the start of the coming term.
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the judiciary chairman, said he expects Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing to last up to four days. Kavanaugh is expected to face questioning on Sept. 5, the committee said. The committee hasn't announced a witness list, but said to expect “testimony by those who know Judge Kavanaugh the best, outside legal experts, and the American Bar Association.”
The September 4 start date would come 57 days after President Trump's announcement of Kavanaugh's nomination. The committee's announcement of the forthcoming hearings noted that the three most recently confirmed justices—Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor—had hearings 48 to 49 days after the president announced their respective nominations.
Senate Republicans action on the vacancy created by Justice Anthony Kennedy's departure means they aim to fill his seat less than three months after his July 31 retirement. The Senate's inaction on Judge Merrick Garland's nomination by President Barack Obama meant the late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat remained vacant until Gorsuch was confirmed—more than 400 days after the vacancy was created.
The 15 Supreme Court vacancies since 1970 before Kennedy's exit were filled within 55 days on average, according to the Pew Research Center. The longest gap between a vacancy and a replacement justice came in 1846, when Justice Robert C. Grier filled a slot that remained open for 841 days—or more than two years—after the death of Justice Henry Baldwin.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGenerative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses
7 minute read6th Circuit Judge Readler Cautions Against Shaming Lawyers Over Election Challenges
3 Lawyers Mount Defense Against Ethics Charges Over 2020 Election Fraud Lawsuits
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250