Critical Mass: Roundup Trial Goes to Jury | New Expert Standard in New Jersey | 7th Circuit Fee Focus
The first trial over whether Monsanto's Roundup causes cancer wrapped up on Tuesday, and the plaintiff's lawyers weren't shy about what they wanted.
August 08, 2018 at 12:00 PM
5 minute read
Critical Mass Law.com Amanda Bronstad Monsanto Roundup $412 million New Jersey Supreme Court expert evidence Seventh Circuit [email protected] @abronstadlaw.
➤ Would you like to receive Critical Mass as an email? Sign up here. Or subscribe to our new RSS feed.
|
A Big Ask in the Roundup Trial
Monsanto Roundup $412 million verdict covered closing arguments R. Brent Wisner Baum Hedlund George Lombardi Winston & Strawn Courtroom View Network broadcast 40 years of studies and regulatory reviews no link $39 million in compensatory damages $373 million in punitive damages So how did he come up with that figure? $2.2 million in economic expenses $62 million each year in interest six years
|
A Slam Dunk for Daubert
New Jersey Supreme Court 2,100 lawsuits Accutane The court's answer? here Bruce Greenberg Lite DePalma David Buchanan Seeger Weiss Hoffmann-La Roche Paul Schmidt Covington & Burling Daubert Edward Fanning McCarter & English “The perception that New Jersey law on expert admissibility standards was weaker than the Daubert standard, combined with New Jersey being home to so many pharmaceutical and medical technology companies, had made this state a magnet for mass tort litigation. This landmark decision sends a clear message that our trial courts need to apply much more scrutiny to questions of expert admissibility.”
|
Class Notes
Richard Posner U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit class action In a pair of rulings attorney fees Aug. 2 ruling objector lawyers dropping their appeals Here Ted Frank Center for Class Action Fairness Southwest Airlines CCAF Melissa Holyoak July 27 ruling here Here's why it's important Loeb & Loeb Laura McNally “This ruling strikes a blow against attorney's fee gamesmanship in class actions. Class counsel have long been obtaining high fees based on a percentage of a hypothetical maximum claim payout, knowing that in all reality, the number of actual claims will never approach that maximum claim payout. This structure has allowed class counsel to obtain a third or more of a fantastical extra-large pie, knowing full well that the true pie will end up being more like the size of a MoonPie.” Fourth Circuit Thumbs Its Nose at Posner and His Fight for Pro Se Justice
|
Who Got the Work?
Hughes Hubbard & Reed Denmark SKAT bid to coordinate 140 lawsuits $2.1 billion tax fraud scheme Sarah Cave U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan William Maguire Marc Weinstein Neil Oxford John McGoey
Here's a little more from the week … ➤ A bushel of fees Syngenta $1.5 billion $500 million won't be enough to go around Mikal Watts Watts Guerra Lead plaintiffs lawyers Watts was quick to point out ➤ Razorback Review Arkansas legislature $4.1 million referral payment State Street Gerald Rosen Labaton Sucharow Arkansas pension fund ➤ Unlucky Number U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation 13 cases to consider hearing in Santa Fe only in three cases denied more requests raised more questions American Bar Association here Merck Zostavax here
Thanks for reading Critical Mass. See you next week!
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustices Appear Split Over Trucker's RICO Lawsuit Against Cannabis Companies
Hunter Biden Sues Fox, Ex-Chief Legal Officer Over Mock Trial Series
Law Firms Sue Clients for Unpaid Legal Fees as Big Law Collection Goals Ramp Up
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250