This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
An appellate court in Georgia has ruled that a trial court had not abused its discretion in finding that a witness could not offer expert opinion testimony on behalf of two insureds in their lawsuit against their insurer – but that the trial court had abused its discretion in finding that the witness could not offer his opinion as a lay witness.
