The malpractice suit alleged that lawyers for plaintiffs in the underlying case against Prudential made claims against the settlement proceeds for costs and expenses that were actually payments to other lawyers to perform legal work on the case.
July 16, 2018 at 05:20 PM
1 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court has affirmed dismissal of a putative class action against plaintiff lawyers in a mass tort employment discrimination suit against Prudential Life Insurance Co.
The malpractice suit, Chinn v. Snyder, alleged that lawyers for plaintiffs in the underlying case against Prudential made claims against the settlement proceeds for costs and expenses that were actually payments to other lawyers to perform legal work on the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
