In the 12 years since he was confirmed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Judge Thomas Hardiman has developed a reputation as a hardworking jurist who balances the arguments of both sides with the existing precedent. As a result, the judge, who is on the shortlist of potential nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court, cannot be easily labeled, according to those who have practiced before him.

“I don’t think you can put a label on it,” Reed Smith appellate attorney James Martin said. “He would be the first one to resist that he has some sort of pre-disposition in his decision-making that allows you to predict how he’s going to rule in a case.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]