The automatic stay contained in Bankruptcy Code Section 362(a) is fundamental to the effectiveness of the consumer bankruptcy system. Most creditors observe the automatic stay, and refrain from engaging in debt collection activity after a bankruptcy petition has been filed. If there is a doubt as to the applicability of the automatic stay, then a creditor can obtain a comfort order as to the applicability of the automatic stay, or obtain relief from the automatic stay from the Bankruptcy Court.
Nevertheless, there are some minute instances in which some creditors have acted in derogation of the automatic stay and they have continued with their debt collection activity after receiving actual notice of the commencement of a bankruptcy case. In certain limited instances, some creditors have committed egregious violations of the automatic stay to warrant the imposition of punitive damages, not only to compensate the victim but also to vindicate the consumer bankruptcy system.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]