As we reported in our last article, anticompetitive conduct targeting a wide range of industries around the world continues to be a major problem. When a company discovers that it likely has been a victim of such conduct, the initiation of litigation against the companies engaged in collusion is often necessary to recover past damages and to deter future misconduct.
However, there are circumstances where litigation may not necessarily be the optimal strategy for obtaining appropriate redress and recovering damages caused by the collusion. For example, there are often important business considerations, which must be taken into account, especially where the anticompetitive conduct has been committed by a significant supplier, vendor or company that has provided—and may continue to provide—valuable products or services to the company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]