Ninth Circuit Adopts #MeToo Recommendations Against Sexual Harassment
The chief judge said the goal is to make policies and procedures more accessible, understandable and effective.
May 21, 2018 at 05:01 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has taken steps to improve its workplace rules after the #MeToo movement swept through the federal court last December.
Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas announced on Monday that the federal appeals court has accepted several recommendations from a special committee he convened in December to look into workplace policies and procedures for employees.
Chief Judge Sidney Thomas.
“In an effort to promote and safeguard a healthy working environment, our goal is to make our policies and procedures more accessible, more understandable and more effective,” he said.
The adopted changes include establishing a director of workplace relations to oversee workplace issues that arise within the Ninth Circuit courts and provide “discrimination and sexual harassment training,” according to the release by the appeals court.
The release noted that employees, starting in October, will have 180 days to bring a complaint under a revised employment dispute resolution policy, instead of the existing 30-day window.
Other recommendations appear to be aimed at making it easier for employees who have experienced sexual misconduct to come forward.
Changes included “reducing barriers to reporting workplace misconduct”, “providing multiple avenues for employees to seek informal advice on workplace issues” and giving the option of “assisted resolution of workplace disputes.”
The moves come after multiple women accused now-retired Judge Alex Kozinski of engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior. Many of the women worked directly under or with the judge.
Thomas later convened a “special ad hoc committee” to look into workplace issues. The committee, chaired by Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown, includes three other judges in the Ninth Circuit and one San Diego attorney.
“These recommendations are the result of a broad outreach effort over several months to both current and former law clerks and other court employees,” McKeown said. “There was an intensive effort to gather information and hear from court employees about workplace issues.”
The committee said that some of the recommendations came after the committee sent out a questionnaire to “almost 6,000 current and former employees” of the appeals court, other focus groups, and letters to law school deans “soliciting ideas for cooperation between the law schools and the courts with respect to law clerks and externs.”
Separately, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts also directed a working group last year to review the federal judiciary's procedures “for investigating and correcting inappropriate behavior” in the U.S. courts. That report is expected to be released later this month.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Many Legal Jobs Will Be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
DLA Piper Names Corporate Lawyer Gerry Williams as Co-US Managing Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250