Photo: Shutterstock
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday in Nicolaou v. Martin, which involves a woman seeking to sue a doctor who allegedly misdiagnosed her Lyme disease as multiple sclerosis.
May 18, 2018 at 01:45 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
What is adequate confirmation of a patient’s alleged misdiagnosis that would start the clock on the period for suing a doctor?
That was the question at issue during the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s argument Thursday in Nicolaou v. Martin, which involves a woman seeking to sue a doctor who allegedly misdiagnosed her Lyme disease as multiple sclerosis.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
