Looking Behind the Numbers in The Am Law 200 Rankings
The Am Law 200 results tell an interesting, complex story. We will examine what the results mean for that market segment and the firms around it.
May 10, 2018 at 09:23 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The results of our Am Law 200 ranking will be released May 22 and offer up some fascinating insights into the health of a market segment that is experiencing different realities from its Am Law 100 brethren.
The American Lawyer and ALM Intelligence will host a webinar analyzing the results and what it means for the market moving forward. You can sign up for the free webinar here. The webinar will be held Tuesday, May 22 at 1 p.m. EST.
The Am Law 200 rankings paint a much different picture of the health of that group of firms as compared with the financial success of the first 100 highest-grossing law firms in the United States. The list saw more volatility when it came to new entrants and those who dropped off. But a closer look at the numbers shows a lot of strong performances across the Second Hundred. This webinar will examine what led to the shakeup, what removing certain outliers does to the overall picture of the Second Hundred's financial stability and how a certain group of firms was able to succeed in a market typically cast as trailing behind the Am Law 100.
All of this will be put into context of what we can expect next year across the Am Law 100 and 200 as well as what this means for the NLJ 200-500 firms. Nicholas Bruch, senior analyst with ALM Intelligence, and Marcie Borgal Shunk, founder of The Tilt Institute, will join The American Lawyer editor in chief, Gina Passarella, to discuss the results.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Cleary Creates Nonequity Partner Tier, Calling for 'Innovation and Adaptation'
5 minute read
Surpassing Cravath Associate Pay Scale, Boutique Seeks to Stay Above Market
3 minute read
Baker McKenzie Sets Profitability Goals, Focusing on New York
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
