U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch on Monday chided their colleagues for passing up “another opportunity” to end the “constitutionally suspect” power of federal agencies to interpret their own regulations.

Thomas, joined by Gorsuch, dissented from the high court’s decision not to review the case Garco Construction Inc. v. Speer. At the heart of the dispute between the construction company and the U.S. Army was a judicial doctrine known as “Auer deference,” which requires courts to give controlling weight to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]