Judge Nixes SeaWorld's Bid for Sanctions Against Covington & Burling in Killer Whale Case
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California denied SeaWorld's motion for sanctions against Covington & Burling.
February 27, 2018 at 08:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Killer whales in Sea World, San Diego.
SeaWorld has lost its bid to make its opposing counsel pick up a $2 million and running legal tab in a class action lawsuit over life in captivity for killer whales.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California denied SeaWorld's motion for sanctions against Covington & Burling, which has five lawyers of record working on the case in San Francisco and San Diego. The lawsuit accuses Orlando-based SeaWorld of misleading potential visitors with false claims that captive orcas live as long as those in the wild and that babies are allowed to stay with their mothers. The plaintiffs argue they would not have purchased tickets and merchandise from SeaWorld, had they known those claims were untrue.
“SeaWorld asks the court to impose sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (“Rule 11”) against plaintiffs' counsel on the basis that plaintiffs' deposition testimony shows their claims were groundless and counsel knew—or should have known—that to be true,” White wrote in a four-page order. “SeaWorld also argues that the involvement of Earth Island Institute (“EII”) and the International Marine Mammal Project in this case demonstrates that counsel filed and pursued the case for an improper purpose.”
SeaWorld opposed the organizations assisting the plaintiffs because of their opposition to orcas being kept in captivity. SeaWorld accused Covington lawyers of recruiting “puppet plaintiffs” to join in a case already being made.
Both sides could take heart from parts of White's order. He said that deposition testimony and other documents show “it is evident that EII and plaintiffs' counsel were in search of class representatives well before the case was filed.”
But in considering sanctions, White said he must use the “improper purpose” prong of Rule 11, which “considers whether plaintiffs' claims had a colorable basis in law and whether the various iterations of the complaint were well-grounded in fact.”
Although White has granted SeaWorld's motions to dismiss portions of the plaintiffs' claims, he said he “cannot say the plaintiffs did not have a colorable basis for asserting the claims that have since been dismissed.”
White said he was “troubled” by some inconsistencies in one of the plaintiff's deposition testimony regarding who purchased the ticket to SeaWorld. But he said SeaWorld was repeating earlier arguments.
Bottom line: “There were triable issues of fact on most of the issues raised.”
SeaWorld's defense team leader is John Simpson of Norton Rose Fulbright in Washington. He could not be reached immediately for comment.
Covington & Burling's Christine Haskett, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, referred an inquiry to the firm's spokesman, who said by email: “We are pleased with the court's decision and look forward to trying the case.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Justified Termination Does Not Bar Associate Attorney From Unemployment Benefits, State Appellate Court Rules
5 minute read
Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute read
Federal Judge Warns of 'Serious Sanctions' on FDIC Over Document Retention
3 minute read
Hogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 2Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed With Caution
- 3DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 4Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250