A state appeals court has issued a terse but clear ruling that lets stand claims that Paul Callan, a CNN legal analyst and former name partner at Callan, Koster, Brady & Nagler, attempted to secretly spirit away a potential new client, allegedly costing the firm millions.

In a lawsuit that draws battle lines between Callan, a 30-year litigator, and the Manhattan law firm he helped create, a unanimous Appellate Division, First Department, panel issued a six-paragraph decision that points to unspecified “evidence in the record” of the conduct alleged. It also largely affirms Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Ellen Coin’s denial earlier this year of an attempt by Callan and his co-defendants to dismiss the various fraud-based claims lodged against them.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]