A common complaint about arbitration is the delay caused by litigation. After all, arbitration is supposed to be faster and less expensive than litigation. If pre- and post-hearing trips to the courthouse unnecessarily delay the final judgment, then the parties’ intent is frustrated. As is often said: Justice delayed is justice denied.

The path of a dispute involving a credit card-holder in Williams-Hopkins v. LVNV Funding, Inc., A-3398-21, 2023 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1787 (App. Div. Oct. 17, 2023), appears (as is all-too-often the case) particularly disappointing.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]