L-R: José Astigarraga of Reed Smith, Adolfo E. Jimenez of Holland & Knight, and Gary Birnberg of JAMS (Courtesy photos)
As more litigants turn to arbitration, regardless of whether a ruling is binding or if attorneys are able to appeal the ruling to one of the Florida circuit or federal courts, foreign litigators face a dilemma.
Suppose their home court judiciary fails to understand and respect that arbitration is intended to be final and binding and should be subject to review only on a limited basis. In that case, litigators have a competitive disadvantage if they choose to litigate in places such as Miami, London and Paris, in which the courts understand and respect arbitration.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
