An Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal judge has found that Philadelphia-based Mitts Law is not entitled to nearly $2 million in attorney fees it is seeking from former clients it represented in a RICO class action against IBM.
December 30, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
An Eastern District of Pennsylvania federal judge has found that Philadelphia-based Mitts Law is not entitled to nearly $2 million in attorney fees it is seeking from former clients it represented in a RICO class action against IBM.
The court previously found that the firm, which already received a $4 million flat fee for its work on the case, was not entitled to additional fees because it breached its fee agreement with its former clients when it failed to pay third-party vendors.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
