A Guide To Our Methodology

Up and Out

This year, two expansion-minded Philadelphia firms joined The Am Law 100, and two San Francisco firms fell off.
Newcomers How they got there
Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley Tenzer Greenblatt merger
Duane, Morris & Heckscher Proceeds from Pennsylvania’s tobacco settlement
Fenwick & West IPO work; Napster litigation
Preston Gates & Ellis Microsoft work; increased tech focus

Dropped out of sight Where they went
Graham & James Acquired by Greenberg Traurig and Squire, Sanders & Dempsey
Rogers & Wells Merged with Clifford Chance
Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts Merged with Pillsbury Madison & Sutro
Littler Mendelson Labor and litigation work was flat; dropped to The Am Law Second Hundred

East Versus West

Top Bay Area firms still bring in less money than their New York counterparts, but the gap is closing.

Top Five New York Firms Gross Revenue 2000 % Increase over 1999
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom $1,154,000,000 12.6%
Shearman & Sterling $590,000,000 20.3%
Davis Polk & Wardwell $525,000,000 14.1%
Sullivan & Cromwell $516,500,000 9.0%
Weil, Gotshal & Manges $505,500,000 15.0%
Average: $658,200,000 14.2%
 
Top Five Bay Area Firms Gross Revenue 2000 % Increase over 1999
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison $476,000,000 51.7%
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati $450,000,000 52.0%
Morrison & Foerster $437,000,000 35.9%
Cooley Godward $345,000,000 62.0%
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe $320,000,000 21.2%
Average: $405,600,000 44.6%


Trimming the Ranks

Several Am Law 100 firms reduced their number of equity partners in 2000, even though their gross revenues increased.
Firm Percent change in number of equity partners Number of equity partners in 2000 Percent change in gross revenue Gross revenue, fiscal year 2000
Sidley & Austin -25.8% 193 6.1% $473,000,000
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius -20.7% 230 20.0% $515,400,000
Kilpatrick Stockton -12.1% 138 17.7% $176,500,000
Locke Liddell & Sapp -11.1% 176 8.6% $175,000,000
Arter & Hadden -10.2% 123 6.3% $155,267,000
Pepper Hamilton -10.0% 99 15.5% $145,142,900
Katten Muchin Zavis -9.4% 96 6.7% $212,285,000
Foley & Lardner -7.5% 283 16.2% $363,000,000
Perkins Coie -6.0% 141 28.4% $215,754,500
Hunton & Williams -5.7% 230 14.3% $318,000,000
Jenner & Block -5.6% 168 0.2% $182,427,500
McGuireWoods -4.8% 138 12.3% $210,000,000
Preston Gates & Ellis -4.2% 133 22.7% $149,030,000
Dewey Ballantine -4.2% 113 10.6% $306,500,000
Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe -4.2% 138 33.1% $261,500,000

Profits Per Equity Partner

The average gain in PPP was just 3 percent last year.

Biggest increases in profits per partner, 1999 to 2000
Kelley Drye & Warren 46.2%
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 39.7%
Buchanan Ingersoll 37.7%
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison 36.8%
Cooley Godward 35.9%
Howrey Simon Arnold & White 33.7%
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice 31.7%
McGuireWoods 29.5%
Shook, Hardy & Bacon 28.9%
Baker Botts 28.6%
 
Biggest decreases in profits per partner, 1999 to 2000
Brown & Wood -15.6%
Goodwin Procter -9.9%
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi -8.7%
Coudert Brothers -8.3%
Willkie Farr & Gallagher -7.8%
Fulbright & Jaworski -7.1%
Cahill Gordon & Reindel -5.9%
Jenner & Block -5.6%
O'Melveny & Myers -4.8%
Sullivan & Cromwell -4.1%

Gross Revenue

Many, though not all, Am Law 100 firms had double-digit gains last year. Only four saw their revenues decline.
Biggest increases in revenue, 1999 to 2000
Greenberg Traurig 62.3%
Cooley Godward 62.0%
Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley 55.8%
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 52.0%
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison 51.7%
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo 51.1%
Fenwick & West 46.8%
Dechert 44.9%
Covington & Burling 43.5%
Howrey Simon Arnold & White 41.0%
 
Smallest increases in revenue, 1999 to 2000
Coudert Brothers 5.5%
Willkie Farr & Gallagher 4.6%
Goodwin Procter 2.6%
Chadbourne & Parke 2.1%
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker 2.1%
Jenner & Block 0.2%
 
Decreases in revenue, 1999 to 2000
Baker & Hostetler -0.3%
Cahill Gordon & Reindel -1.2%
Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal -3.8%
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi -8.4%

(The American Lawyer, July 2001)


-----------------------------------------------------------

Note: Law firms with hypertext links paid a fee to participate in law.com's law firm marketing program. Whether or not a firm participates in that program in no way influences whether the firm appears in the survey, or its ranking.

----------------------------------------------------------



About Law.com Copyright 2000