'Bait and Switch' Advertising and the Lanham Act

Milton Springut writes: A recent Eastern District decision held that use of a trademark in "bait and switch" advertising does not constitute trademark infringement (although it might constitute false advertising). In dismissing the plaintiff's infringement complaint, the decision appears to have unduly narrowed the scope of Lanham Act actionable "confusion."

Sign up for a free Law.com trial now!

Law.com's Elite 15-day trial gives you:

  • All access pass to legal news across ALM's Network
  • News by Practice Area, available exclusively on Law.com
  • The free Law.com InPractice digital newsletter
  • Personalized legal news on the Law.com mobile App

During and after your trial, you'll receive the benefits of an ALM digital membership, including a subscription to the Law.com Newswire digital newsletter.