A divided Supreme Court ruled Monday that a public defender attacked by her own client at a state psychiatric hospital can proceed with claims against various state officials that her substantive due process rights were violated by a state-created danger.
June 30, 2014 at 06:14 PM
1 minute read
A divided state Supreme Court ruled Monday that a public defender attacked by her own client at a state psychiatric hospital can proceed with claims against various state officials that her substantive due process rights were violated by a state-created danger.
The three-judge majority, led by Justice Barry Albin, further ruled that the defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
