A 2012 Court of Appeals decision did not change the pleading standard for unjust enrichment claims, a unanimous Appellate Division, First Department panel ruled Tuesday.
March 21, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A 2012 Court of Appeals decision did not change the pleading standard for unjust enrichment claims, a unanimous Appellate Division, First Department panel ruled Tuesday.
Justice Rolando Acosta (See Profile) wrote for the panel in Philips International Investments v. Pektor, 651526/11, joined by Justices Peter Tom (See Profile), Richard Andrias (See Profile), Helen Freedman (See Profile) and Paul Feinman (See Profile).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
