A judge skewered a divorcing husband in a fight over legal fees, calling him "the most consistently obstructive, least cooperative, cagiest, least candid witness that the court has observed."
December 31, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A judge skewered a divorcing husband in a fight over legal fees, calling him “the most consistently obstructive, least cooperative, cagiest, least candid witness that the court has observed.”
Westchester Supreme Court Justice Charles Wood (See Profile) ordered Joseph Medina to pay $53,000 in fees to his ex-wife in light of his “recalcitrance and obstructionist tactics.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
