A Delaware federal judge has ruled that Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner Ian DiBernardo's patent prosecution work for the plaintiff in an infringement case 15 years ago doesn't disqualify him from representing one of the defendants.
November 30, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In an infringement case, a Delaware federal judge has ruled that a lawyer’s patent prosecution work for the plaintiff 15 years ago doesn’t disqualify him from representing one of the defendants.
On Nov. 21, Judge Richard Andrews of the District of Delaware denied Walker Digital LLC’s motion to disqualify Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner Ian DiBernardo from representing defendant On-Net Surveillance Systems Inc.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
