Appellate Division, Second Department, Brooklyn, New York.(Photo: David Handschuh/ALM)
The Appellate Division, Second Department said in the decision that Hollie, whose decisions have been reversed by the appellate court on several other occasions, unfairly inserted himself into the trial two years ago.
July 11, 2019 at 05:22 PM
1 minute read
In a rare move for an appellate court in New York, a panel of jurists ordered a new trial for a man from Queens this week to be presided over by a different judge, saying that Queens Supreme Court Justice Ronald Hollie inappropriately interfered with proceedings.
The Appellate Division, Second Department said in the decision that Hollie, whose decisions have been reversed by the appellate court on several other occasions, unfairly inserted himself into the trial two years ago.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
