X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Wayne Smith and Timothy Hatch have built an impressive record defending ITT Educational Services Inc. against long-running claims that it violated rules governing how for-profit education companies manage their businesses and compensate student recruiters. As we've reported, Hatch's work for ITT beginning more than a decade ago helped Gibson Dunn establish itself as a go-to defense firm for the for-profit education industry.

On Monday, however, Gibson Dunn hit a serious snag in its defense of ITT, which remains squarely in the sights of lawmakers and plaintiffs lawyers targeting for-profit education companies.

In a major reversal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit resuscitated a whistleblower's False Claims Act lawsuit against ITT, throwing out an Indianapolis judge's August 2011 decision dismissing the case. Not only that, the appellate court vacated a scathing $400,000 sanctions order against the whistleblower's lawyers at Motley Rice and two other plaintiffs firms. And finally, in what could be interpreted as a rebuke to U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, the Seventh Circuit ordered the case assigned to a new judge to oversee summary judgment briefing and a potential trial.

The Seventh Circuit panel rejected Pratt's finding that a Mississippi plaintiffs lawyer named Timothy Matusheski had recruited a "know-nothing" whistleblower to sue ITT for defrauding government aid programs based on public information about ITT's admissions and recruiter compensation practices. Pratt had ruled that "Matusheski plucked a prospective plaintiff out of thin air and tried to manufacture a lucrative case." But the appeals court concluded that whistleblower Debra Leveski presented substantial new allegations based on her decade-long employment with ITT, giving the federal courts jurisdiction to hear her case. Moreover, the panel ruled that Matusheski and his co-counsel at Motley Rice and Plews Shadley Racher & Braun did nothing wrong in approaching Leveski or helping her to press her case.

This premium content is locked for
Litigation Daily subscribers only.

  • Subscribe now to enjoy unlimited access to Litigation Daily content,
  • 5 free articles* across the ALM Network every 30 days,
  • Exclusive access to other free ALM publications
  • And exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2017 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.