Featured Sponsors

Featured TL Resource

Practice Areas

News

Voting Rights Act Lives to Fight Another Day

Texas Lawyer

Monday, June 29, 2009

Once again, a Texas civil rights case threatened to turn constitutional law on its ear, but last week the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion on the Voting Rights Act that left both sides happy. Gregory Coleman (pictured), a partner in the Austin office of Yetter, Warden & Coleman, represents the utility district pro bono in the case.

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

Supreme Court Steps Back on Voting Rights Act

The National Law Journal

Monday, June 22, 2009

There was considerable suspense in the Supreme Court chamber Monday morning as Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. began announcing the Court's much-awaited decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, the challenge to the constitutionality of a central part of the Voting Rights Act.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling on Judicial Recusal

The National Law Journal

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

In a landmark ruling that could affect state judicial elections nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 8 said that due process can require a state judge to recuse when a party in a case before him or her has had a "significant or disproportionate" influence on placing the judge on the court through an outsized donation to the judge's election campaign. The case is Caperton v. Massey Coal Co.

In Texas Case, High Court Considers Legality of Voting Rights Act

Texas Lawyer

Monday, May 4, 2009

Congress renewed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 three years ago with wide bipartisan support. But on April 29, the future of the law seemed in peril, as conservative members of the U.S. Supreme Court expressed strong doubt about its constitutionality.

In Texas Case, High Court Considers Legality of Voting Rights Act

The National Law Journal

Thursday, April 30, 2009

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote on the challenge to the Voting Rights Act will be crucial, voiced deep concern about the differential treatment of states under the law, and the affront to the sovereignty of the states that are required to go through the preclearance procedures. The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder.

Letter to the Editor

Texas Lawyer

Monday, March 30, 2009

"The Best Form of Judicial Selection"

advertisement