Practice Areas

News

Tunica Web Advertising v. Tunica Casino Operators Association Inc.

Texas Lawyer

Monday, August 27, 2007

The district court erred in applying the Sherman Antitrust Act in finding that the per se rule only applies in situations where one of the conspirators is a direct competitor of the victim.

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.

Texas Lawyer

Monday, October 30, 2006

There must be evidence of"demonstrable economic effect,not just an inference of possible effect, to find a violation of Texas antitrust law.

Cleere Drilling Co. v. Dominion Exploration & Production Inc.

Texas Lawyer

Monday, December 15, 2003

Examining the contract's use of the term"contamination,the court is not convinced that any sort of environmental harm is required.

Dijo Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Texas Lawyer

Monday, December 8, 2003

The improvident admission of opinion testimony requires vacature of the quantum of the jury's damage award.

Blue Star Operating Co. v. Tetra Technologies Inc.

Texas Lawyer

Monday, December 8, 2003

The question whether a DTPA defendant's conduct was "knowing" does not focus on whether the plaintiff's injury might reasonably have been anticipated. Instead, "knowing" conduct requires actual awareness by the defendant that his conduct is unfair or deceptive.

Working Together Alleviates Sarbanes-Oxley Pressures

Texas Lawyer

Monday, December 1, 2003

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ushered in a new era of corporate governance and changed the regulatory landscape within which public companies and their in-house counsel operate. In-house counsel face mounting pressure to comply and keep current with the new governance rules.