Texas Lawyer
Monday, March 4, 2013
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her writing to illuminate the high court's denial of a petition for writ of certiorari in a Texas case, issued a statement to dispel any doubt that her colleagues' refusal to hear the case signals "our tolerance of a federal prosecutor's racially charged remark. It should not."
The National Law Journal
Monday, October 15, 2012
The University of Texas' affirmative action admissions policy, and perhaps even a 2003 landmark ruling on race, appeared in serious trouble on Oct. 10 during arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Texas Lawyer
Monday, August 27, 2012
Ninety-one amici met the Aug. 14 deadline to file briefs in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, et al., a high-profile case that will be argued at the U.S. Supreme Court in October.
New York Law Journal
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Southern District Judge J. Paul Oetken has declined to hear fraudulent conveyance and preferential transfer claims in Arbco Capital Management's bankruptcy case, ruling that, even in light of a U.S. Supreme Court decision that the bankruptcy court cannot finally adjudicate the claims, it is most efficient for that court to hear them in the first instance.
The National Law Journal
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
In a case at the intersection of law and modern reproductive technology, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that state inheritance laws will determine whether children conceived after their fathers' death are eligible for Social Security survivors benefits. In Astrue v. Capato, the justices examined the interplay of several sections of the Social Security Act.
The National Law Journal
Monday, May 21, 2012
At age 92, retired Justice John Paul Stevens continues to travel around the country, freely offering commentary about his former colleagues while also tossing out verbal bouquets to lawyers he admires. Stevens' speech at the University of Texas Law Review's annual banquet last month was no exception.