The appellant challenges his conviction for alleged drug-trafficking. Jackson alone states the test for reviewing sufficiency of evidence supporting a conviction, and any glosses on that standard are not applicable. Even though the evidence here is circumstantial, it meets the Jackson standard. The conviction is affirmed. 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-41363, 03-14-2013.
United States v. Vargas-Ocampo
March 19, 2013