Font Size: increase font decrease font

Jacobson v. State

Tex. Crim. App.

February 11, 2013

The court of appeals held, under the judicially created De Garmo doctrine as modified by Leday, that appellant was estopped from complaining about the state's jury argument during the guilt phase because he had later admitted his guilt. A defendant who testifies at the punishment stage of trial and admits his guilt does not forfeit his right to complain on appeal about errors occurring during the guilt stage. The court of appeals' judgment is reversed and remanded. Court of Criminal Appeals, No. PD-1466-11, 02-06-2013.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
Find similar content
  1. Former State Bar of Texas Employee Pleads Guilty to Theft
  2. Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  3. Judges Spar, But Fake Lawyer's Conviction Stands
  4. Litigator of the Week: Dog Bites Man
  5. Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace